#ThisWeeksFiddler, 20250808

This week the #puzzle is: Can You Canoodle at the Coldplay Concert? #probabilities #geometry #integral #estimat #montecarlo

All the many attendees at a particular Coldplay concert are couples. As the CEO of Astrometrics, Inc., you are in attendance with your romantic partner, who is definitely not the head of HR at Astrometrics, Inc. During the concert, the two of you spend half the time canoodling.
The camera operators love to show people on the jumbotron during the concert, but time is limited and there are many attendees. As a result, the camera operators show just 1 percent of couples during the concert. Couples are chosen randomly, but never repeat at any given concert.
You and your partner are shy when it comes to public displays of affection. While you don’t mind being shown on the jumbotron, you don’t want to be shown canoodling on the jumbotron.
How many Coldplay shows can the two of you expect to attend without having more than a 50 percent chance of ever being shown canoodling on the jumbotron?

And for extra credit:

Now, everyone at the concert spends at least some time canoodling. In particular, each member of a couple wants to spend some fraction of the time canoodling, where this fraction is randomly and uniformly selected between 0 and 1. This value is chosen independently for the two members of each couple, and the actual time spent canoodling is the product of these values. For example, if you want to canoodle during half the concert and your partner wants to canoodle during a third of the concert, you will actually canoodle during a sixth of the concert.
Meanwhile, the camera operators love to show canoodling couples. So instead of randomly picking couples to show on the jumbotron, they randomly pick from among the currently canoodling couples. (The time shown on the jumbotron is very short, so a couple’s probability of being selected is proportional to how much time they spend canoodling.)
Looking around the concert, you notice that the kinds of couples who most frequently appear on the jumbotron aren’t constantly canoodling, since there are very few such couples. Indeed, the couples who most frequently appear on the jumbotron spend a particular fraction C of the concert canoodling. What is the value of C?

Can You Canoodle at the Coldplay Concert?

Highlight to reveal (possibly incorrect) solution:

Program

And for extra credit:

Spreadsheet Desmos Program

Ladehus-effekten, en rapport

Jeg har læst “The Report on the Barnhouse Effect”, #KurtVonnegut. Quick fix. Spoilers.

Ved et tilfælde opdager en videnskabeligt orienteret person, at han kan noget i retning af telekinese. Han øver sig, og han noterer sig, hvordan det virker, så andre evt. kan oplæres også. Det er naturligt at forestille sig, at regeringen bør bruge denne nye teknik.

Efter et skuffende møde med militæret går vor helt under jorden. Hans egen mission bliver at ødelægge moderne våben, når han opdager dem. Pacifistiske allierede råber gerne højt, når de finder en ny base.

Det ser ud til at virke. Konflikter må fremover afgøres med køller, og det er et stort fremskridt. Så de 2 tilbageværende spørgsmål er: Kan missionen videreføres efter mandens død (ja), og er der noget at stille op mod sådan en enegænger? Det sidste må man gøre op med sig selv. Kan det blive et våben at påstå, at min fjendes hospital er en våbenfabrik? Kan fremstilling og oplagring af våben decentraliseres? Hvad synes du?

#ThisWeeksFiddler, 20250801

This week the #puzzle is: Can You Squeeze the Squares? #optimal #placements #packing

There’s a square board with side length A. Your friend cleverly places a unit square on the board and challenges you to place another unit square on the board—without moving the first one—so that it too is entirely on the board and the squares don’t overlap. (The unit squares can touch each other.)
Alas, it’s impossible for you to do so! But there’s some minimum value of A for which you can always place a second unit square on the board, no matter how cleverly your friend places the first one.
What is this minimum value of A?

And for extra credit:

Now there’s another square board with side length B. This time, your friend cleverly places three unit squares (which can touch but not overlap) and issues a similar challenge, asking you to place one more unit square on the board.
Once again, it’s impossible for you to do so! But there’s some minimum value of B for which you can always place a fourth unit square on the board, no matter how cleverly your friend places the first three squares.
What is this minimum value of B?

Can You Squeeze the Squares?

***

“Last Week’s Fiddler. Congratulations to the (randomly selected) winner from last week: 🎻 Lise Andreasen 🎻 from Valby, Copenhagen, Denmark.” 😁😁😁

***

Highlight to reveal (possibly incorrect) solution:

Desmos 1 Desmos pictures 1 and 2.

And for extra credit:

Desmos 2

#ThisWeeksFiddler, 20250725

This week the #puzzle is: Can You Sprint to the Finish? #probabilities #strategy #optimal

… you and a competitor are approaching the finish of a grueling stage of the Tour de Fiddler. One of you will win the stage, the other will come in second. As you approach the finish, each of you will test the feeling of your legs, which will be somewhere between 0 percent (“I can barely go on!”) and 100 percent (“I can do this all day!”). For the purposes of this puzzle, these values are chosen randomly, uniformly, and independently.
Immediately after feeling your legs, you and your opponent each have a decision to make. Do you maintain your current pace, or do you sprint to the finish? Among those who sprint for the finish, whoever’s legs are feeling the best will win the stage. But if no one sprints for the finish, everyone has an equal chance of winning the stage. In the Tour de Fiddler, you must each decide independently whether to sprint for the finish based on your legs—you don’t have time to react to your opponent’s decision.
Normally, teams at the Tour de Fiddler keep their strategy and tactics close to the vest. But earlier today, your opponent’s manager declared on international television that if (and only if) your opponent’s legs were feeling 50 percent or better, they’d sprint for the finish.
As you are about to test your legs for the final sprint and see how they feel, what are your chances of winning the stage, assuming an optimal strategy?

And for extra credit:

Instead of one opponent, now you have two—meaning three riders in total. As luck would have it, the managers for both other riders proclaimed that they’d sprint for the finish if (and only if) their legs were feeling 50 percent or better. Note that your opponents’ feelings are independent of each other.
As the three of you near the finish, your own team manager radios you the following message: “If your legs feel <garbled> percent or better, sprint for the finish!”
You can’t make out what the garbled part of the message is, and you’re too tired to radio back for confirmation. Instead, you somehow muster the energy to randomly, uniformly pick a number between 0 and 100 to fill in the blank from your manager’s message, thereby determining your racing strategy—optimization be damned!
Right before you choose your random strategy and test your legs, what are your chances of winning the stage against both opponents?

Can You Sprint to the Finish?

Highlight to reveal (possibly incorrect) solution:

And for extra credit:

Program

Hugo-relateret

Det er på tide at skæve til Hugo-kategorien Best related. Diverse med andre ord.

“Charting the Cliff: An Investigation into the 2023 Hugo Nomination Statistics” og “The 2023 Hugo Awards: A Report on Censorship and Exclusion” er nyheder. De gav et stort plask, da de var nye, og de har påvirket Worldcon. Specielt den anden.

“The Spectacular Failure of the Star Wars Hotel” er en video på YouTube. Jeg så den faktisk, da den var ny. En yderst grundig analyse. Jeg blev dog lidt irriteret over de jævnlige skift af kostume.

r/Fantasy’s 2024 Bingo Reading Challenge (r/Fantasy on Reddit) er mest af alt et fænomen. Jeg kender ikke så meget til det, men det lyder da interessant.

Jeg har allerede behandlet Speculative Whiteness: Science Fiction and the Alt-Right og Track Changes: Selected Reviews.

ISFDBISFDBKarakter
“Charting the Cliff: An Investigation into the 2023 Hugo Nomination Statistics”Camestros Felapton and Heather Rose Jones👽👽☠️
“The 2023 Hugo Awards: A Report on Censorship and Exclusion”Chris M. Barkley and Jason Sanford👽👽👽
“The Spectacular Failure of the Star Wars Hotel”Jenny Nicholson👽👽☠️
r/Fantasy’s 2024 Bingo Reading Challenge (r/Fantasy on Reddit)(a lot or people)👽👽☠️
Speculative Whiteness: Science Fiction and the Alt-RightJordan S. Carroll👽👽👽
Track Changes: Selected ReviewsAbigail Nussbaum👽👽☠️

Åh, det er svært. Men Hugo-rapporten står mit hjerte nær.

Spor ændringer

Anmeldelse af Track Changes: Selected Reviews, af #AbigailNussbaum. Bog. 2024. Hugo-finalist.

Skitse: En bog fuld af anmeldelser.

Er det science fiction? Bl.a.

Temaer: Anmeldelser. Ikke min yndlingsgenre. Men hvad jeg lige prøvesmagte virkede velskrevet. Analysen af WandaVision er fx tankevækkende. Også af The City and the City.

Citat: “… what bothered me about Discovery were the obvious limitations in its understanding of the Star Trek franchise, and of what could – and should – be done in it:

Like the reboot movies before it, Discovery seems to think that the most – perhaps the only – interesting question to ask within the Star Trek universe is “should we have a Federation?” […] But the thing is, this is literally the most boring, basic question one can ask about Star Trek. The real challenges posed by a society like the Federation aren’t questions of if, but of how. How do you create a truly just, fair, equal society? How do you balance freedom of conscience and opinion with your core values of tolerance and peace? How do you prevent the exploitation of those who are weaker than you? How do you help people outside your society, and do you have the right to encourage them to be more like you?”

Er det godt? Ja. Men som sagt ikke min yndlingsgenre. 👽👽☠️

Spekulativ hvidhed

Anmeldelse af Speculative Whiteness: Science Fiction and the Alt-Right (gratis), af #JordanSCarroll. Bog. 2024. Hugo-finalist.

Skitse: Den her ser på forskellige måder, hvorpå fascister bruger science fiction. Hvad der bliver skrevet og filmet, læst og set. Hvilke holdninger det kommunikerer og understøtter. Og hvilke videnskabelige fejl, det er nødt til at begå. Her er en flok citater:

Er det godt? Det virker godt researchet. Jeg er jo ikke den rigtige til at vurdere, om det hele er korrekt. Men det virker godt og sammenhængende. Og naturligvis er det her et godt tidspunkt at skrive den her bog på. 👽👽👽

#ThisWeeksFiddler, 20250718

This week the #puzzle is: Can You Meet Me at the Mall? #ExpectedValue #average #maximum #probabilities

You and two friends have arranged to meet at a popular downtown mall between 3 p.m. and 4 p.m. one afternoon. However, you neglected to specify a time within that one-hour window. Therefore, the three of you will be arriving at randomly selected times between 3 p.m. and 4 p.m. Once each of you arrives at the mall, you will be there for exactly 15 minutes. When the 15 minutes are up, you leave.
At some point (or points) during the hour, there will be a maximum number of friends at the mall. This maximum could be one (sad!), two, or three. On average, what would you expect this maximum number of friends to be?

And for extra credit:

Instead of three total friends, now suppose there are four total friends (yourself included). As before, you all arrive at random times during the hour and each stay for 15 minutes.
On average, what would you expect the maximum number of friends meeting up to be?

Can You Meet Me at the Mall?

Highlight to reveal (possibly incorrect) solution:

Program 1 Program 2

And for extra credit:

Desmos 1, 2 and 3. Probability of two events occurring at overlapping times. Desmos 4.

Hugo-romaner

Så er vi nået til Hugo-romanerne.

ISFDBISFDBMigKarakter
A Sorceress Comes to CallT. KingfisherEn troldkvinde kalder👽👽👽
Alien ClayAdrian TchaikovskyUdenjordisk ler👽👽☠️
Service ModelAdrian TchaikovskyTjenestetypen👽👽☠️
Someone You Can Build a Nest inJohn WiswellNogen at bygge rede i👽☠️☠️
The Ministry of TimeKaliane BradleyTidsministeriet👽👽👽
The Tainted CupRobert Jackson BennettDen beskidte kop👽👽👽

En god kategori. Men det må blive tidsministeriet, den sad bare.

Den beskidte kop

Anmeldelse af The Tainted Cup, af #RobertJacksonBennett. Roman. 2024. Hugo-finalist.

Skitse: Kol er assistent for Ana, der efterforsker forbrydelser. I dag besøger Kol et gerningssted for at se det hele. Så rapporterer han senere til Ana. Lige i dag er det hele lidt mere spændende, fordi forbrydelsen er et mord. Afdøde blev gennemboret af et voksende træ.

Er det science fiction? Nix. Absolut fantasy.

Temaer: Kol er som led i sin karriere blevet forbedret, så han husker virkelig godt. Den slags forbedringer er der mange af i imperiet. Basis for den slags forbedringer er, at man tapper døde søuhyrer for væsker og eksperimenterer med dem. Et stort job for imperiet er at forhindre søuhyrerne i at komme på land.

Kol er efter min vurdering ordblind. Og så udtrykker han som regel ikke sine følelser. Og han virker bi. Ana virker autistisk: Hun får nemt for mange stimuli og går aldrig ud. Derudover har vi fat i noget Watson/Holmes-dynamik. Ana har brug for udfordringer, ellers tager hun stoffer.

Jobtitlerne lyder romerske: Kol er signum. Andet lyder Schweizisk: Imperiet er opdelt i kantoner. Atter andre inspirationer kommer fra andre lande. Noget er arabisk?

Citat: “A towering, slategray cliff, running underneath the redstained sky like a frame below a painting, its stone wet and gleaming and crawling with vines and growth; and there, in one long, vertical seam in the cliff, a hint of movement: some insect, I thought, crawling from base to top in a slow, labored procession. My eye trembled as I focused on it. I realized it was not an insect but instead a tiny box, wrought of wood, being hauled up on a set of strings. As it reached another notch in the gray cliffs, the box stopped, and even tinier figures emerged. Horses. Four of them, all hauling a shining steel bombard from the box. I blinked, staring into the spyglass. The tiny box was not tiny at all: it was a lift, made for hauling troops and armaments up the vast expanse of the sea walls.”

Er det godt? Meget sjældent er der en fodfejl. “Finally Ana finished.” Har første og sidste ord ikke samme rod? Det er noget rod (!) at have dem så tæt på hinanden. Men alt overvejende, så virker den her bog bare. 👽👽👽